Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atrium Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Atrium Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page has existed for over a year, and yet has never had more than one reference (which is behind a paywall so hard to verify, and doesn't sound promising). Google search turns up only press releases and company's own sites. News search turns up the same thing. Thus, the article does not verify that the company meets either

Hi we have updated the article and adding the biographies - will add more references when I get a chance. We have also created one in the French version. Tried to keep the article neutral and factual, so no overt selling/advertising. More about general information and awareness — Preceding unsigned comment added by Despeck (talk • contribs) 31 August 2010

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nothing to indicate the company is notable, so adding to the biographies won't help. A search of Google and Google News finds only press releases and other self-referential material. --MelanieN (talk) 01:42, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.