Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audy Ciriaco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 17:21, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Audy Ciriaco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run of the mill minor league player. Fails GNG Yankees10 03:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep ~~Weak Delete~~ Currently a free agent and is ostensibly a non-notable minor leaguer. Did find these though: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] ~~EDIT: Changed vote to Weak Delete.~~ EDIT again: After further reconsideration, changing vote to weak keep. His service time at Triple-A (parts of four years plus two full years) just barely puts him over the top, when the aforementioned sources are also taken into consideration. Alex (talk) 04:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Spanneraol (talk) 18:58, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 20:59, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Article was featured as a DYK. Don't know if that matters. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 06:10, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you might want to hold off on voting then until you determine if that's a good reason for keeping or not.--Yankees10 08:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very well. Right now, I'll say it is a reason to keep. I am willing to be convinced otherwise. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 13:13, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Alex (talk) 22:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no significant sources to pass GNG. Wizardman 15:56, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails
WP:GNG. Mdtemp (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:39, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.