Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurra Bhatnagar Badoni

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 12:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aurra Bhatnagar Badoni

Aurra Bhatnagar Badoni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Less sources, does not meet criteria. DasSoumik (talk) 17:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DasSoumik (talk) 17:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unable to find RS to support notability. Vikram 08:37, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Times of India is not RS and the India Today article is a puff piece. Not sufficient to establish notability. Vikram 10:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep has some RS, secondary in depth sources that cover her independently also she is just 9. ImNotAnEntrepreneur (talk) 09:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.