Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austriamicrosystems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lack of references is

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log

)

The article has no reference citations and appears to be a synthesis of cut and paste from http://www.austriamicrosystems.com/ Jezhotwells (talk) 22:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non-consumer business manufacturing components -- The company focuses on the areas of power management, sensors and sensor interfaces, portable audio and car access -- unlikely to be the topic of significant coverage outside the trade. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• The article was originally created by me. Since then, clearly someone within the company had turned it into something of a brochure which is not at all the kind of entry we want. However over the last few weeks, it has been steadily improved by a number of people and is now much more factual. It could use a little further improvement I grant you, but it's on the way. I don't agree that a business which does not sell to consumers directly is automatically a subject for deletion. There are many very large manufacturers which have little or no consumer product portfolio, but it does not make them unimportant. I hope and trust that we can remove the deletion tag soon.
  talk) 12:48, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:24, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep needs work, but possibly notable. A public company , so there ought to be some financial data and information on market share. Wherther a company derals with consumers or not is totally irrelevant to notability, though it does affect the nature of the sources likely to be available. Considering non-consumer businesses as less notable is systematic bias--if anything, their under-representation here is a reason to be flexible on sources. DGG (talk) 05:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.