Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avantika Hundal

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural keep. Nominator blocked, no-one advocating for deletion, and improvements to the article render this discussion moot. Daniel (talk) 14:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Avantika Hundal

Avantika Hundal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lack of reliable references which are independent of the subject. Fails

WP:GNG LucyLucy (talk) 12:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. LucyLucy (talk) 12:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. LucyLucy (talk) 12:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. LucyLucy (talk) 12:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I have found and added a variety of news sources to support
    WP:NACTOR, and it appears Hundal has had "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows," based on the news coverage. Beccaynr (talk) 01:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.