Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axel Vogt
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Definitely room for expansion using the sources for support. Consider tagging it for a wikiproject to work on if you cannot. Keeper | 76 02:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Axel Vogt
- Axel Vogt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough notability – the references are fairly obscure, and the subject lacks specific reasons to be notable by himself cherkash (talk) 21:54, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cameron11598 (Converse) 22:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Person seems non- notable appears to fail ]
- Comment Careful sifting through the GBooks hits seems to suggest that the subject had at least some influence on locomotive and other railway-related design and innovation during his years with Pennsylvania Railroad - not that any of this has ever got so much as a mention in the article. However, I must leave it to others to decide whether the influence was significant enough for notability. Oh, and by the way - sources can be both obscure and reliable. PWilkinson (talk) 19:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. Note to the nominator: obscurity of sources is not a reason for deletion. The article needs to be expanded to make it clearer what his contributions to history were, which I will do today. Compare e.g Nigel Gresley, George Jackson Churchward -- men who held similar positions of note who have better filled-out articles. Vogt was equivalently influential in his field. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 20:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.