Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aygün Kazımova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. So Why 08:47, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aygün Kazımova

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:ANYBIO. The sources are at best passing mentions fanclubs and tabloid press coverage Domdeparis (talk

) 17:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC) For the same reasons I also nominate for deletion the following page.[reply]

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The awards page is properly sourced and appears to confirm notability, at least at the national level. As for the tabloid press coverage, she is a pop singer, featured also by mainstream media articles (e.g. 1,2). 84.73.134.206 (talk) 11:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@

reliable sources the overview states "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.". Is the coverage significant and are the sources in the 2 articles reliable sources? I do not believe so hence my nomination. Domdeparis (talk) 13:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep the main article and merge the awards page into it. Google news search is showing many sources from Azerbaijan in addition to the 2 mentioned above including non- tabloids, enough to pass
WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 14:32, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge the two together and keep. I basically agree with what Atlantic306 said above. That being said, the article is low quality, and should be drastically rewritten by someone who understands English and what an Encyclopedia is. Dysklyver 10:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 05:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable person. Fails GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.