Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAA Training

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Sourcing is insufficient. A redirect may be created as a matter of editorial discretion, but there's no clear target here. Star Mississippi 14:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BAA Training

BAA Training (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NCORP. Refs are routine business news and annoucements scope_creepTalk 18:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Can you post
WP:THREE reference so we can see what references you found, because I don't think there is anything apart from the usual trade PR and press-releases. scope_creepTalk 19:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
already added to the page BoraVoro (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Both those references you added to the article fail
WP:SIRS. I think your a UPE dude. scope_creepTalk 09:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
I agree, the sources are more like press-releases. But, I didn't tell I added three best sources (as you may think), but I added some new sources to the page. My fault that reply sounded like "I did find and added". And please refrain from blaming me in some sort of promotion, as it is even prohibited by by Wikipedia. I think there is some rule, that the article and sources should be discussed, not people. BoraVoro (talk) 10:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.elnacional.cat/es/tecnologia/los-pilotos-de-air-india-se-formaran-en-lleida-alguaire_1112328_102.html kind of good source. But I'm not sure if it passes Orgind BoraVoro (talk) 10:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 01:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editor is a
WP:SPA and likely a UPE. scope_creepTalk 15:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Delete per above. Maybe the whole article is UPE as assumed by creep. Okoslavia (talk) 07:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.