Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babajob.com
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Euryalus (talk) 03:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Babajob.com
- Babajob.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An advertorially toned article on an unremarkable job site; significant RS coverage to meet
WP:SPIP sourcing. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the missfortune 13:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Delete: An article sourced to routine funding and appointment announcements and to coverage discussing the firm as one among others seeking to establish themselves in an area. I am not seeing ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment/Move Whatever the outcome, the website address should not be the title.[Username Needed] 13:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.