Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babylon 5: Clark's Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Babylon 5 (franchise)#Novels. Tone 11:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Babylon 5: Clark's Law

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just like (apparently) all B5 novel articles, this article is basically a plot-only summary in violation of

Babylon_5_(media_franchise)#Novels, but not for stand-alone articles. So, especially with the WP:NOT#PLOT concerns, delete (or redirect this to the franchise article), or leave it around for another 10 years in this sorry state? – sgeureka ^t•c 12:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. – sgeureka ^t•c 12:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. – sgeureka ^t•c 12:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 11:33, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Babylon 5 (franchise)#Novels. No sigcov found in my
WP:BEFORE. FOARP (talk) 13:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect to Babylon_5_(franchise)#Novels per FOARP. I also was not able to find any significant coverage of the book in reliable secondary sources, but it would serve as a plausible search term to be redirected to the main list of books from the franchise. Rorshacma (talk) 14:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above to Babylon_5_(franchise)#Novels. Little coverage of the individual book in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 15:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.