Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baker and Partners

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:39, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Baker and Partners

Baker and Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable law firm; significant RS coverage to meet

WP:SPIP, or other unsuitable sources. Likely created for compensation; pls see: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Another_day.2C_another_sockfarm. PROD removed by a SPA Special:Contributions/Nathannicholls. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:47, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:48, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Lack of in depth coverage beyond press releases indicates a failure of
    WP:CORPDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Jersey-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.