Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bald Move (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bald Move

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm opening another AfD for this page because I felt that the consensus made in

inherit

notability from notable products, shows, people and other things associated with the company. If the shows produced by this company are notable than they should be created as independent pages.

Here's a rundown of the sources that were previously cited. Desert News mentions the phrase "Bald Move" a total of three times "Jim Jones and A. Ron Hubbard, hosts of the movie and television podcast 'Bald Move'", "Hubbard of 'Bald Move' agreed", and "according to the 'Bald Move' podcast hosts". These are trivial mentions that don't provide any useful information about the company. Lifehacker mentions "Bald Move" once saying "Another fan favorite is Watching Westworld, from the Bald Move slate of TV podcasts" which is also clearly a trivial mention. 25YL which mentions "Bald Move" once saying "This week I’m looking into We Do: A Watchmen Podcast, from Bald Move". Metro mentions "Bald Move" once saying "This podcast is hosted by Jim and A.Ron of Bald Move" which is clearly a trivial mention of the company. Desert News mentions the company once saying "Jim Jones and Aaron Hubbard, hosts of a podcast network called 'Bald Move'" which is clearly a trivial mention. 25YL mentions the company in one sentence saying "The folks at Bald Move have started Foundation and Podcast on their 'Bald Move Pulp' feed."

It's also worth mentioning the reliability of the sources.

WP:METRO is listed at RSP as generally unreliable. The one 25YL source doesn't appear to have an author and the other is written by a staff writer Brien Allen, but it appears anyone can send in an article to be published. It looks like LifeHacker has had varying levels of reception at RSN. Desert News does appear to have consensus at RSN as a reliable source. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:54, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Entertainment, and Companies. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:54, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with nom, I can't find much else for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 13:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.