Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baranavichy Ghetto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete. After extended time for discussion, there is a clear absence of consensus for deletion. BD2412 T 01:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Baranavichy Ghetto

Baranavichy Ghetto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable stub seemingly taken verbatim from Baranavichy#20th century. Noahfgodard (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge or redirect: there isn't enough for a stand-alone article on this topic. However, it is fine as a title to redirect to Baranavichy#History or a new sub-section titled Baranavichy#Baranavichy Ghetto. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 17:54, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Most similar articles about World War 2 ghettos have articles. Why delete this one? It is short but can easily be expanded. I see many mentions in my Google search. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GhettoInvestigator (talk • contribs) 09:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - What makes you think it is non-notable? - GizzyCatBella🍁 14:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - @GizzyCatBella: Admittedly only a cursory search, but I don't think there is enough coverage to establish notability for the ghetto in its own right. It's true, though, that I should have modified my claim of non-notability, as it could certainly be disproven; it's simply my position given the article's current sourcing and my own looking around. --Noahfgodard (talk) 16:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Sourcing from Scholar and Books can be located under the name "Baranovichi". Extremely unlikely a Holocaust ghetto would be non-notable. AusLondonder (talk) 02:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, there is clearly scope for expansion here, especially with respect to the activities of the Jewish underground resistance. Covered in depth in [In the Shadow of the Red Banner: Soviet Jews in the War Against Nazi Gemany, The Holocaust in the Soviet Union and Encyclopedia of the Holocaust. SpinningSpark 17:36, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or move to draft space. There is clearly way insufficient sources in the article now to justify its existence as a stand-alone article. Funnily enough, people keep saying there is a wealth of resources to be added. Well, they could be afforded a chance to make of this a worthy entry in draft space. Otherwise, just delete. XavierItzm (talk) 00:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  WP:NEXIST. SpinningSpark 08:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Comment I'm still of the mind that the coverage available (and I am aware of
  WP:CWW. --Noahfgodard (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep lots of sources in google and google scholar. Softly falling rain (talk) 01:33, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.