Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara London (actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara London (actress)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN actress, largely in bit and uncredited parts. Fails NACTOR, and not merely no evidence she meets the GNG, the article's never been sourced. Ravenswing 06:45, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - all this article says is that Barbara London is an actress (which is obvious from the article's title) and then gives a list of performances by her. The sole reference given is a reference to the subject's own website, meaning the article relies too much on primary sources. Vorbee (talk) 09:40, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the source isn't to London's website (if any exist, I couldn't find it), but to
IMDB, which of course cannot contribute towards notability. Ravenswing 13:05, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Article is terribly written and poorly sourced. This article is not worthy of being in the encylopedia as it is.Celestina007 (talk) 03:42, 01 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Couldn't find a thing when looking for sources - seems to just be a minor bit player. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is scary that this article has existed since 2009 without any reliable sources. It is high time that we stoppped trying to be IMDb, started applying reasonable criteria to articles on actresses, and deleted all articles that lack reliable sources. This has been happening a little, but there is a lot more work to be done.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:54, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.