Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Poppe

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on

]

Barbara Poppe

Barbara Poppe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A government agency director turned private consultant in a niche field who have connection. When a government agency obtain reports, they often make it available to the public which is then picked up by the media and that's just how it is. The person does not pass the ANYBIO criteria. The article was also crated by someone working for as made evident by the "ich" suffix in the article creator's name.

"The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times." - does not appear so.

"The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field." does not appear so. not widely recognized after doing google scholars search.

"The person has an entry in the Dictionary of National Biography or similar publication." - nope Graywalls (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Logs: 2020-08 move to Draft:Barbara Poppe
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio 11:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 18:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.