Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbie Itungo Kyagulanyi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Black Kite (talk) 22:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barbie Itungo Kyagulanyi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barbie Itungo Kyagulanyi

Ugandan author who does not satisfy

move-warring

.

An article should

speak for itself

, and it should not be necessary to check the references to verify notability. However, a check of the references shows that none of them are independent or secondary. (The reference check also found copyvio, which was tagged for redaction.)

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Secondary
1	Caring Hearts Uganda	Her organization	No	No	No
2	Flash Uganda Media	A puff piece	No	No
3	The Independent Uganda	An interview	No		No
4	Lifestyle Uganda	A Q&A piece about the subject	No	No	No

Naïve Google search shows the same information on social media as was found in the references, nothing we didn't know.

Recommend moving back to draft again, with instructions to use AFC. (I am not moving it back to draft unilaterally to avoid move-warring.) Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify as per source analysis above. (giving this article another chance for improvement is quite generous, since the author had 5 months to improve it but instead chose to re-publish it without any attempt to address the issues) MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: I’m in agreement with the nomination and discussion above. If abandoned the G13 process will handle the case for deletion. 2pou (talk) 16:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.