Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basno
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SoWhy 07:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Basno
- Basno (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The bulk of this article (>98%) comes from someone whose activity mimics that of a PR professional (see activity here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/A0Carol ). This was done 4 years ago. The company has had virtually no significant press coverage other than a couple of features e.g. nextweb here https://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2011/05/31/basno-brings-trophies-and-brand-loyalty-to-the-social-web and techcrunch on funding https://techcrunch.com/2013/07/02/basno-1m-badges which has in past convinced some that it's enough for
WP:GNG however for me I don't think it's sufficient. If you're on the fence, the clincher may be that it has 268 facebook likes, suggesting a very small and insignificant following https://www.facebook.com/BasnoInc Rayman60 (talk) 01:11, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:47, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- WP:PROMO on an unremarkable tech startup. Such companies are rarely notable, and this one does not stand out in any way. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:55, 30 June 2017 (UTC)]
- Delete as non-notable and promotional per the nom's good research. --Lockley (talk) 18:56, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.