Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beast (state of being)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Beast (state of being)
- Beast (state of being) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article appears to be entirely
reliable sources to establish this usage, and it does not. Leebo T/C 13:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete The proper approach would perhaps be to tag it with {{would never work anyway Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 13:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I prodded this article because it reeked of original research. It wasn't verifiable, nor sourced. There are also issues with WP:NEO and the article doesn't exert its notability. -Andrew c [talk] 13:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does seem to violate WP:N. Best case scenario would be to condense and transwiki to Wiktionary as a slang alternate definition. Saturn 5 14:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per Saturn 5. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 20:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per saturn 3tmx 23:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While I do love using this term- in fact, I'd go so far as to say it's a beastly word- it's an NN neologism. -- Kicking222 02:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.