Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belair National Bank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with

czar · · 18:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Belair National Bank

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, along with the Citizens National Bank (Laurel, Maryland) article, are only a couple of sentences long and aren't notable enough to keep on Wikipedia. I propose deleting both of them and redirecting them to PNC Financial Services, who acquired both banks. Jgera5 (talk) 15:58, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm combining this debate with that of Citizens National Bank (Laurel, Maryland), since both debates had identical rationales, and both (to date) had one identical Keep !vote. Both were also not listed until today, so combining them does not short-change one or the other articles in so far as their time at AFD is concerned - both have a full debate starting on this date. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Easily passes both
WP:CORP. Toddst1 (talk) 16:52, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment. I have completed
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizens National Bank (Laurel, Maryland). UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

merge Since Citizens acquired Belair, merge into Citizens. Just enough material to justify an article between the two of them. DGG ( talk ) 03:11, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 00:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 06:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

SarahStierch (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.