Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benoit Ravier-Bollard

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Oleg Alexandrov 04:08, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Benoit Ravier-Bollard

Non-notable. Vanity. Google search: [1] Barfooz (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Don't forget to remove his name from List of photographers once he's gone. Oswax 06:31, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - nn. Most Google hits seem to be mirrors from Wikipedia CLW 08:33, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Vanity. Stu 12:58, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Lack of "notability" is not a criterion for deletion. -- Reinyday, 14:01, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • See
    WP:BIO
    for guidelines on who ought to have a biographical article. The criterion here applicable is:

1. Published authors, editors, and photographers who have written books with an audience of 5,000 or more or in periodicals with a circulation of 5,000 or more.

He needn't meet this if there is another reason for his having an article. But there is none. Oswax 14:18, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:BIO isn't a policy. ··gracefool |☺ 08:17, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete per
  WP:BIO Groeck 15:26, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. While non-notability is not an official criterion for deletion, is a de facto one established by years of precedent. This article is non-notable.
  Talk 17:30, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Could go on Yellowikis if the author so wishes.
    Talk 17:31, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • If non-notability was a criterion with consensus, it would be official policy. ··gracefool |☺ 08:17, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, vanity. Shauri 20:17, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an

undeletion request

). No further edits should be made to this page.