Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Burgess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:10, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beth Burgess

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article (cleaned up some of it) for a non-notable author. Self-written articles, trivial book listings and 1 low-quality PR interview (ref#2, with exactly zero independent journalistic content) do not establish notability. The vast majority of sources are from the author, not about the author as required by

WP:GNG. A Google-search did not reveal any promising in-depth sources, just a few more listings, her own publications, and a few passing mentions in articles (incl. some possible false positives). GermanJoe (talk) 13:31, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 14:04, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 14:04, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:43, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can find only two mentions of her in news sources (1 tabloid, 1 not, but then only one of several people giving opinions on the benefit of having an alcohol-free month). The citations of the book to which she contributed two chapters (1) are mainly in other works by the editors, and (2) do not refer to her chapters. Does not meet
WP:GNG RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom. Article lacks reliable sources. A Google search turned up mostly fluff. Clearly fails
WP:AUTHOR. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 18:10, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete appers to be
WP:PROMO for a non-noatble addiction recovery therapist, who writes about the topic.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.