Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bible thumper
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. chat} 16:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bible thumper
Article on slang dictionary entry. Delete from
]- Keep. This is a common phrase in the language. the article needs expanding, not deletion. fuzzywolfenburger
- Transwiki to Wiktionary r3m0t talk 00:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This is a very well known expression. Could be expanded through literary references. -- JJay 01:53, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Not only there are precedents justifying the article's deletion but you should also know that Wikipedia is not a dictionary --Mecanismo | Talk 10:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The article is useful and should be kept and expanded. I get +95,000 hits for this [1]and the term has been in use since at least the 1930s. The article also discusses software. Furthermore, I would appreciate if you refrained from throwing wikipedia links in my face. I have not talked about the repeated mistaken Afd noms I have seen lately. Please try to contribute constructively to the discussion. -- JJay 21:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Not only
- Delete. Violates WP:NOT.Gateman1997 21:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki per R3mot. Stifle 23:19, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki per R3mot. SailorfromNH 02:33, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep.Quidam65 04:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.