Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Three (Oklahoma City Thunder)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Big Three (Oklahoma City Thunder)
Per comments
too soon to access the notability of this "Big Three", which may only exist for one season. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 21:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Delete Agree with The Slick wholeheartedly. Not enough coverage, just Okies shooting big. :) New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Sources As mentioned in the deprod, there were sources already listed at Talk:Big Three (Oklahoma City Thunder). I'm relisting those here for convenience, as well as some additional ones. These are not routine game recaps.
- "NEW-LOOK THUNDER STILL ADJUSTING". Sports On Earth. November 15, 2017.
- "OKLAHOMA CITY'S BIG THREE SHOOTING FOR THEIR 1ST NBA TITLE". Associated Press. October 12, 2017.
- "Behind its big three, Thunder riding an offensive hot streak". The Oklahoman. January 5, 2018.
- "Is time running out on Oklahoma City's Big Three experiment?". ESPN.com. December 13, 2017.
- "NBA Preview: Will Thunder's 'Big Three' challenge Warriors?". Sportsnet.ca. October 14, 2017.
- "Shooting struggles continue for Thunder's big three". The Oklahoman. December 14, 2017.
- "The Key to Making OKC's Big Three Work". The Ringer. September 24, 2017.
- Delete hype for the sports pages/websites of no lasting importance or encyclopedic value. Legacypac (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Hasn't really caught on. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The trio have not lasted long enough, nor acquired enough winning impact together, to warrant their own page. If George, Anthony, and Westbrook are together for several more seasons of significant success, then maybe. In essence, the article is too premature at best. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to WP:N, which states that GNG "is not a guarantee that a topic will necessarily be handled as a separate, stand-alone page. Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article." No prejudice to reconsider a standalone article if the grouping is still covered next season, when it would not fit into one season's article anymore.—Bagumba (talk) 13:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.