Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bino Gambino
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 00:44, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Bino Gambino
- Bino Gambino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet
WP:GNG. Almost all the sources are primary sources from the organization he is working for. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 08:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions /// Also ping @MPJ-DK: who just PROD-ed this. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 08:39, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 08:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 08:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, all sources like this and this are from own websites and showing ranking from self publishing blogs like this. Fails WP:GNG --A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 10:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)]
- Delete - While the SuperLuchas site is the web part of a magazine with an editorial process (not a blog) it just confirmed that he exists and that's not enough or I would have my own entry as well. This guy is not notable and has no independent third party reliable sources to prove it. MPJ -US 15:30, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.