Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishop Place, Arizona

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop Place, Arizona

Bishop Place, Arizona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. –dlthewave 21:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave 21:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave 21:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Even if it weren't actually a locale, there's nothing establishing notability. There's scores more of these, we can do a batch soon. Reywas92Talk 21:39, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'm actually just now noting how exceptionally disruptive all of these nominations are - these AfDs have been done only a couple minutes one right after the other and without any
    WP:BEFORE search. SportingFlyer T·C 23:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
SportingFlyer Some nominators research... and then list all at once. I did so before I nominated ten or so, and Reywas did so before a bulk nomination. Lightburst (talk) 00:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.