Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) Nightfury 08:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Bitag

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination on behalf of OccultaCogitat, here is their statement from WT:AFD:

“

Requesting to complete the AFD nomination for the "Bitag" page found within the Wikipedia. A lot of info is questionable and there are only a few references pertaining to the TV show. Most references and external links pose little significance to the entirety of the article itself. Personnel found in the infobox is no longer associated with my colleague who happens to run the TV show.

As much as I want to edit its contents, I lack the proper references to do so.

Kind regards, OccultaCogitat (talk) 06:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

”

I have no opinion about the subject. So Why 06:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. So Why 07:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. So Why 07:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 20:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment have removed some unreferenced sections, could you perhaps remove more unreferenced material rather than delete? Atlantic306 (talk) 17:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Per
WP:TVSERIES. Lourdes 03:00, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Though I was just brought into this AfD nomination by familiarity with the topic of the article, I agree with above. If you can add any usable RS or update the article, why don't you do it yourself. The TV show as a public service has played a role in resolving corrupt practices and crime as a media between the people and law enforcement and the courts, and regular media coverage is enough to keep this here. -TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 04:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.