Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Boys Code

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Black Boys Code

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject lacking independent coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 14:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 11:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 11:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 11:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 11:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 14:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 03:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails
WP:GNG Ajf773 (talk) 04:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 00:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Organization article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. The only ref is a deadlink to a personal blog for a photographer. A search turned up no significant
WP:NONPROFIT. Dialectric (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.