Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Sundress

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by

non-admin closure) Gong show 20:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Black Sundress

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG - Not notable
WP:Promo/WP:Sock - Article has been almost entirely edited/maintained by sockpuppets [1]
WP:WalledGarden - Of sockpuppet created, maintained, and endorsed articles. PeterWesco (talk) 00:43, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not establish notability. However, nominator has not provided information about claims of
sockpuppets. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:50, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

I included a link in the AfD (see above) to the most recent sockpuppet investigation and also on your talk page with much more detail. PeterWesco (talk) 01:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

czar · · 01:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.