Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blogfoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:01, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a definition of a neologism that does not have a widespread common usage, and is not of encyclopedic character. Thesquire 21:47, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Wiktionary. Delete —
  Wackymacs 22:20, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Wiktionary won't take this. There's no such word. Uncle G 16:43, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as part of the "War on Portmanteaux" --MacRusgail 16:02, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.