Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Cha Cha

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Good work by Canley in sourcing and improving the article. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:41, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Cha Cha

Blue Cha Cha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Kind regards, JJK2000 (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Canley (talk) 17:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Canley (talk) 17:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The submission to the Oscars indicates notability in Taiwan. Addressing some of the criteria in
    WP:NFO: in the 2005 Golden Horse Awards, the film won the award for Best Original Film Score. Also Lu Yi-ching was nominated for the Golden Horse for Best Supporting Actress, and won the Best Supporting Actress award at the Asia-Pacific Film Festival in 2006. The film was screened at the Kaohsiung Film Festival in 2016 (eleven years after its release), won the Grand Prize of the 33rd Brussels Independent International Film Festival[1], and was reviewed in Variety. --Canley (talk) 18:44, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep Per Canley's rationale. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of submissions to the 79th Academy Awards for Best Foreign Language Film Kolma8 (talk) 09:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    My rationale did not save... I think this
    WP:2S should not have a separate article. If that did not develop into something more than 2 sentences since 2005, it will likely stay this way...unless someone will commit to search to reviews and update the article then keeping it probably reasonable. But anyhow, a redirect makes sense to me. Thanks Kolma8 (talk) 09:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep, or even "speedy keep". Nomination is inadequate; there is no mention of wp:BEFORE in this nomination or in other recent nominations by this editor-nominator. I have given feedback along these lines to nominator at their Talk page and at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reverse curve, and commented similarly to this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Oloom wal-Technologia. Perhaps this (and other nominations by same editor) should be speedily closed as an admin matter because there is, in effect, no argument for deletion supplied. --Doncram (talk) 23:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]