Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Oval News

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Oval News

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable

talk) 00:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
talk) 00:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: article does not cite a single source. I would be open to revising my vote if sources are added.

Editchecker123 (talk) 06:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Found a reference in Norwegian, but still probably not enough. There might be more in old newspapers from pre-2000 though. - Indefensible (talk) 20:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Any chance you can share the link here? I believe from
WP:RS the language of the article isn't the determining factor. I’m happy to integrate it into the article. Editchecker123 (talk) 16:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
@Editchecker123 Here's the link > https://www.bilnorge.no/bilverden/ford-slutter-fred-med-blue-oval-news/1549475, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:12, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of any notability, Other than the link above I cannot find anything at all on this news company, Fails SIGCOV & GNG>. –Davey2010^Talk 17:29, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.