Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Hansell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Katie^talk 11:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Hansell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

OTRS agent: Deletion requested in ticket:2016070510017734. (t) Josve05a (c) 20:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete local politician without enough coverage to rise to GNG level.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing actually suggesting convincing independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Like said above, local politicians generally don't meet GNG. — Music1201 ^talk 21:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NPOL. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:52, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.