Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Kerr (reporter)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 05:48, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Bob Kerr (reporter)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bob Kerr (reporter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
WP:GNG. Of the four sources in the article at time of writing [1], #1 is written by Bob Kerr himself, #2 is an interview regarding "an oral history of 1968", #3 is his employer's bio of him, and #4 basically said he was fired. Seems like a run-of-the-mill journalist. starship.paint (talk) 03:34, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. starship.paint (talk) 03:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. starship.paint (talk) 03:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Note: a related article, Nicholas Alahverdian, has been subject to a lot of disruption, including sockpuppetry. Some of that has been listed at Talk:Nicholas Alahverdian#Page history. There may be some incoming SPAs. starship.paint (talk) 03:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Smitty Werben 04:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)]
- Delete Run of the mill non-notable journalist. Provided sources are either primary, unreliable, or do not cover him in enough detail. ♟♙ (talk) 18:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- delete more local news puffery about a journalist who had an extensive but ultimately non-notable career. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 18:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- comment. Odd how the Boston Globe thought the firing of this non-notable journalist worth a story [2] --Calton | Talk 18:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete not enough coverage. He was basically local to the Boston Globe's coverage area, and 1 story does not make someone notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:45, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- delete current content fails WP:BIO - difficult to tell if more sources so exist due to common name but does not appear to be notable. KylieTastic (talk) 21:34, 18 December 2020 (UTC)]
- Delete--we're not a directory, and this is no more than just such an entry. Drmies (talk) 01:52, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete — With a rationale that dissects the sources used in that manner, it’s safe to say this is article's subject is non notable. Celestina007 (talk) 07:50, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.