Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Kerr (reporter)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:48, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Kerr (reporter)

Bob Kerr (reporter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG. Of the four sources in the article at time of writing [1], #1 is written by Bob Kerr himself, #2 is an interview regarding "an oral history of 1968", #3 is his employer's bio of him, and #4 basically said he was fired. Seems like a run-of-the-mill journalist. starship.paint (talk) 03:34, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. starship.paint (talk) 03:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. starship.paint (talk) 03:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: a related article, Nicholas Alahverdian, has been subject to a lot of disruption, including sockpuppetry. Some of that has been listed at Talk:Nicholas Alahverdian#Page history. There may be some incoming SPAs. starship.paint (talk) 03:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
Smitty Werben 04:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
A single article doesn't satisfy the requirements of the GNG, particularly for a BLP. ♟♙ (talk) 19:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This article, Calton, doesn’t even mention a single significant story that Kerr was best known for reporting? Seems like he is indeed a normal journalist with a long career. starship.paint (talk) 23:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.