Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob McMahon (politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bob McMahon (politician)

Bob McMahon (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mayor of city of about 5k. Fails to meet

• Delete Fails
  WP:NPOLITICIAN. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Mayors of places this size can clear the inclusion bar if their articles can be substantively written and sourced, but they do not get an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist. Most of the sourcing here, further, is to invalid
  WP:GNG pass in lieu of NPOL. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 21:47, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete as not solidly satisfying the applicable notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 03:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Redirect to Media, Pennsylvania. Curro2 (talk) 03:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable mayor of a small place.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.