Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Papenbrook

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I'm persuaded by those editors advocating Deletion that the sources providing SIGCOV just aren't there. Liz Read! Talk! 06:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Papenbrook

Bob Papenbrook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe that this person does not meet

WP:ENT. signed, SpringProof talk 20:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • This article joins many others, an absolute sourcing nightmare. Names of
    living people
    abound and many times not sourced. Not finding anything substantial I went through some links:
I went through several with the same results. -- Otr500 (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.