Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BodyArmor SuperDrink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for contributing and please remember to

SarahStierch (talk) 02:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

BodyArmor SuperDrink

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been deleted a number of times as spam (on the

shouted version of the title). Is this version any better? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotional. Coretheapple (talk) 19:55, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and tone down the writing. It has 3 or 4 independent references in major news and business media (I'm not sure whether Bay Area Sports Guy is an RS). Much better than the deleted version, which was mostly a list of flavors. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see a blog post in Forbes, which is self-published and not an RS, as well as two others, counting Bay Area Sports Guy, not an RS. All relate to an endorsement, which I don't think really is the kind of coverage contemplated in the guideline. Coretheapple (talk) 21:25, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a notable product. The references in the article are mainly press releases, and that is what I found in a search. Even things that look like Reliable Sources, such as this Wall Street Journal link or this Yahoo! News story, turn out to be press releases from Marketwired. --MelanieN (talk) 22:41, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Since it's been deleted at least three times, maybe

salting is in order as well. --MelanieN (talk) 22:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep, but definitely make the writing a little less like a "promo" but as far as being notable, many pro athletes have partnered and invested in it such as Andrew Luck, Mike Trout, and LeSean McCoy. MrAdaptive343 (talk) 08:52, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTINHERIT. --MelanieN (talk) 14:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.