Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonesteel (band)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. GirthSummit (blether) 15:19, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Bonesteel (band)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bonesteel (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Semi-advertorialized article about a band, with no strong claim to passing
WP:GNG if it's the best you can do. As always, bands are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist: they have to have a notability claim that passes NMUSIC, and they have to have real reliable source coverage in real media to support an article, but nothing here meets either of those conditions yet. Bearcat (talk) 14:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not enough RS yet. Caro7200 (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. I prodded this article a few days ago for not being notable due to not having significant coverage in reliable sources. A WP:BEFORE search turned up no reliable sources. This concern is still valid as the current sources are mostly links to songs (not independent and not reliable) and to unreliable blogs. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 17:44, 3 April 2020 (UTC)]
Delete per nom. They don't yet meet GNG or NBAND. JSFarman (talk) 00:40, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:04, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.