Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boss Major

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boss Major

Not notable album by not notable publisher (see other afd)

TALK) 23:37, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete red link label, mostly red link artists. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 23:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know the answer!: non-notable label+red link artists=non-notable album. Schuym1 (talk) 23:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have the record label listed just below this, I figured they should be listed seperately.
TALK) 00:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 10:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Why was it relisted? The consensus is to delete. Schuym1 (talk) 00:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If an admin feels that you are right he can still close it delete. "Relist" doesn't mean it has to run another 5 days. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Schuym1 (talk) 00:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails
talk) 01:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.