Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bowl of Oatmeal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 21:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bowl of Oatmeal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film. Fails

WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 17:53, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete 10 years and no improvement = rubbish bin. I actually don't care, as Wikipedia is a repository of human knowledge. Ce la vie. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 18:22, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 18:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - Fails every relevant notability criteria - I can't believe it has survived so long with such weak references, but I'm glad it has floated up from the bottom so it can be flushed away properly. Exemplo347 (talk) 18:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If this article has not been updated in awhile, and lacks notability, I think it could go.TH1980 (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Google search results shows nothing convincing GNG and NFLIM. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 00:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - student films are
rarely considered notable. Bearian (talk) 17:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.