Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigitte Maier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 13:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brigitte Maier

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

[1]

Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep or delete is fine with me, but how about #3 in WP:PORNBIO "Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media" - see refs in the article and [2]. Materialscientist (talk) 23:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By consensus practice, Penthouse pictorials aren't considered "mainstream" under PORNBIO, nor are softcore men's magazines. The Playboy cite is just a picture/caption in its annual rather arbitrary compilation of "sex star" photos, with perfunctory accompanying text. "Mainstream" here is intended to exclude appearances in commercial erotica. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 20:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 03:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable pronographic film actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there are no convincing signs of actually better applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She was pretty well known in Europe in her time but technically fails PORNBIO and seemingly doesn't have enough coverage to pass the GNG.Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 19:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or redirect to Sensations (film). I think it can be argued that she meets WP:PORNBIO #2 for Sensations, the first European porn film to be successful in the US. There were full-page ads for it in the New York Times apparently. Googling around a bit, I found the claim that she was interviewed by the Chicago Sun-Times in 1975, but haven't been able to track that down. Google Book searches for her name and "sensations" lead to a couple of snippets that indicate she was an important porn star of the 1970s. —Kusma (t·c) 19:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I found her on Newspaper Archive in 1975. Those may be a similar interview, Kusma. The problem is that Newspaper Archive is going through a problem with their database and while hits pop up, I can't view them. Here's a link to the search: [3]. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom - definitely fails PORNBIO — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 23:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.