Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bront Bird

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 19:33, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bront Bird (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 02:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep There are enough non-trivial mentions for me to believe that he passes
  WP:GNG.--Giants27(T|C) 19:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep appears to have achieved notability through college play.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:58, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails
  WP:CRYSTAL would suggest not to speculate on future notability based on whether the undrafted player ever plays in the NFL.—Bagumba (talk) 07:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - This isn't an article about a college superstar, this is a stub about a potential NFL player that has yet to play a game. Honor the rule of thumb. Userfy the page so material isn't lost a few weeks from now. Carrite (talk) 02:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Passes
  GNG ---Freja Beha Erichsen (talk) 21:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• He does not pass
  WP:ATH. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:55, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:48, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Passes
  WP:GNG. Has been the subject of significant, non-trivial coverage in the mainstream media. Not just passing references in game coverage, but articles focusing on him as the main subject. See, e.g., [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Cbl62 (talk) 08:33, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.