Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Hildenbrand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:17, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Hildenbrand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's nothing to indicate he's more than a run of the mill journalist. The references are mostly links to his own content, and I can find no coverage of him online. Earning a patent doesn't appear to meet any notability criteria that I can determine. Was PRODed in 2009, otherwise I might have done that here. StarM 01:45, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Provided third-party neutral sources can be found, and the article made more encyclopedic.TH1980 (talk) 02:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TH1980: - Is that a conditional delete/keep, or do you think it is currently clinging on as its sourcing currently is? Nosebagbear (talk)

Yes, that is a conditional delete/keep.TH1980 (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete when you remove all of the sources that pass
WP:GNG (not primary or links to articles he's written), there's nothing left. There's a couple other articles that don't establish notability from Climbing magazine in my Before search and not much else. SportingFlyer talk 02:59, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - currently it doesn't have any sources that aren't either primary, articles written by him, or not neutral bios. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination and above comments. -The Gnome (talk) 22:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even close to being a notable journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (and snow?) Theredproject (talk) 02:14, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails
WP:GNG. Septrillion (talk) 04:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.