Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Herb

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 03:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Herb

Bryan Herb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG, promotional tone Kleuske (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:17, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - poor sourcing, lacks notability Lorelai1335 (talk) 15:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Lorelai1335[reply]
  • Keep with his television appearances alone he must meet GNG, also as an industry spokesman. Gleeanon409 (talk) 16:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Recommend that Gleeanon409 provide sources to back their claim and substantiate their keep vote.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 18:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have a full plate but will try to list sources. Also, there is a case to be made for merging this article to the parent company which non has also put up for deleting. Gleeanon409 (talk) 19:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoom Vacations --Closeapple (talk) 04:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'm not seeing much in the way of coverage in reliable independent sources. He occasionally gets quoted as the travel expert in various news stories, but I don't think it's enough. The main keep argument so far has been
    WP:PROMO issues. It'd be reasonable to redirect to Zoom Vacations, if that article is kept, although I am also skeptical of notability for his company. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete per
    WP:ANYBIO. Not particularly notable. Graywalls (talk) 16:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.