Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan M. Ferguson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.

(non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Bryan M. Ferguson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable KnightMight (talk) 16:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. KnightMight (talk) 16:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate? Superficially it appears to be well, or at least amply, referenced. Do these sources fail to support the content? Does the content fail to support the notability of the subject? Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:16, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mutt Lunker: although there are a large number of citations, many of them say nothing more than "video directed by Bryan M. Ferguson" or do not mention the subject at all. I believe the nominator thinks that there is a lack of reliable in-depth coverage. More than one editor has expressed concerns over possible COI issues with this article. Richard3120 (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's the kind of steer required. Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

...though where have the COI concerns been expressed? There's nothing on the talk page. Mutt Lunker (talk) 21:54, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Sludgepop They're on the article creator's talk page CiphriusKane (talk) 00:07, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.