Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bumberclart
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete - G7. ϢereSpielChequers 09:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bumberclart
- Bumberclart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Definition of neologism with no mentions in
RS. Sources that do exist seem to differ in terms of exact meaning TheSmuel (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
- It's not in the dictionary because it is a term, not a word, and it isnt English, anyway.Liam Robson. (talk) 16:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment On looking further, the word (term?) may not be a neologism but a slang word/term of insult/disgust of Jamaican origin. Nevertheless, it occurs in no reliable sources that I can find and therefore doesn't warrant its own entry. There is already an entry for 'bumbaclot' with a similar etymology on Wiktionary. Perhaps an addition to that could be justified if references can be found. TheSmuel (talk) 17:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It may be a slang term sometimes, nut then again, isn't LOL a slang term, and so is LMFAO. So really, if you should delete Bumberclart, let delete them as well.Liam Robson. (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment On looking further, the word (term?) may not be a neologism but a slang word/term of insult/disgust of Jamaican origin. Nevertheless, it occurs in no reliable sources that I can find and therefore doesn't warrant its own entry. There is already an entry for 'bumbaclot' with a similar etymology on Wiktionary. Perhaps an addition to that could be justified if references can be found. TheSmuel (talk) 17:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as dictionary definition. ReverendWayne (talk) 17:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. No verification found. Laudak (talk) 18:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per ]
- Delete: No verifaction or notability shown. talk) 19:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No, you can delete it if you want, wikipedia's not a dictionary.Liam Robson. (talk) 09:06, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.