Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CADprofi

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 July 10.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CADprofi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A plug-in for CAD software. The only claim to notability in the article is that the software has 32,000 users. I already declined a speedy deletion tag identifying it as a promotional article, and cleaned it up afterwards. However, a Google search returns nothing in the way of reliable sources to establish notability. – GorillaWarfare ^{talk • contribs} 19:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very under-referenced, and notability not established. Wikipedian2 (talk) 22:47, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find anything that suggests that this product meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. Gnome de plume (talk) 13:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep reference links have been added. Klimbert —Preceding undated comment added 08:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Comment The references that you added are all just descriptions of the plugin on pages where it is available for download. Although it is good that those references verify the information in the article, they do not show that the plugin meets the
  notability guideline. – GorillaWarfare ^{talk • contribs} 18:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Delete per nom. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.