Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COVID-19 pandemic in Jilin
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. No argument for deletion has been advanced. Courcelles (talk) 00:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
COVID-19 pandemic in Jilin
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- COVID-19 pandemic in Jilin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is not an article, it looked like a list or something like that. -Lemonaka 13:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -Lemonaka 13:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: COVID-19 and China. Shellwood (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Follows the same pattern as the other Category:COVID-19 pandemic in China by province articles and similar "COVID-19 pandemic in <placename>" articles of which there are a great many. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, list articles do exist. Maybe rename it to something like "List of COVID-19 outbreaks in Jilin? -I.R.B.A.T(yell at me) (The IRBAT Files) 14:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Appropriate provincial level COVID article which we have for basically every province in the world. The article content issue seems surmountable and thus not appropriate for AfD. Jumpytoo Talk 18:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Suffers a bit from WP:PROSELINE, but that is something that can be fixed through editing. The topic clearly meets GNG. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:54, 22 March 2023 (UTC)]
- Keep. The article leaves a lot to be desired, but I don't see why it should be deleted. Suitskvarts (talk) 20:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.