Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlyn Chase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caitlyn Chase

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable blogger. Doesn't appear to be notable. References have mentions, but not significant coverage. Jsfodness (talk) 00:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
Talk to my owner:Online 00:26, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Women, Fashion, and California. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:31, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One source in the Jewish Journal that seems reliable, the Forbes one appears to be a "pay to play" article. Rest are trivial. Oaktree b (talk) 17:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not appear to be notability guidelines. Much of the coverage is not intellectually independent, and some of the comment is
WP:RISING
. She might become notable someday, but she is not at the moment, which is what the question is.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.