Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calia Menethil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

Calia Menethil

Calia Menethil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No out-of-universe information, not notable. Pagrashtak 18:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the
  list of video game deletions. Pagrashtak 18:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the
  list of Fictional characters-related deletions. —Quasirandom 19:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: Notable;
  Wikipedia is not paper; and people not wanting to read this article are usually not forced to read it, the article is found by being linked to in one way or another or by being typed in a URL or search engine. It's not like this article is being being inconvenient or anything. Is it adding extra poundage to a book or something?--Neverpitch 01:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC) — Neverpitch (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply
  ]
• Delete per

  WP:VG/S#Video games.

  User:Krator (t c) 02:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - no siginifcant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Lots of refs in wikis and blogs is not enough. - fchd 06:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per
  WP:FICT's guidelines into List of Warcraft characters. Which, yes, has notability concerns of its own, but the set of characters has a better chance of establishing that than a single (minor) character. Sourcing is a cleanup issue, not cause for deletion. —Quasirandom 20:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Delete and redirect - Has no notability. Judgesurreal777 22:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.