Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Massage Therapy Council
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per
Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 03:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
]
California Massage Therapy Council
- California Massage Therapy Council (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
declined prod. i am the creator. if someone feels this is nonotable enough to propose deletion, the least i can do after deprodding is bring it to AFD for them. I believe the organization is notable. original prod: "Nonnotable local authority of no significance or academic value, no refs other than organization". the last part is not true, presumably as the refs werent noticed due to not being formatted. ive fixed that (no thanks to the WMF for bringing down the toolserver site for reflinks!) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per SK#1: "The nominator withdraws the nomination or fails to advance an argument for deletion—perhaps only proposing a non-deletion action such as moving or merging, and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted. An example of this includes posting a nomination in response to a proposed deletion but advocating a keep position. (If you dispute the deletion of a prod-ed article, just remove the prod-tag, sometimes nobody will want to pursue deletion of the article via AFD anyway.)" --MelanieN (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.